All Services
Application Security

Launch without
hidden vulnerabilities

We combine manual code review with SAST, DAST and SCA to find flaws before they reach your customers. Fixing them during development costs far less than fixing them in production.

ionicz-sca · dependency audit
# ionicz-sca scan --target ./src✓ Scanning 847 dependencies... ● CRITICAL lodash 4.17.20 CVE-2021-23337● HIGH axios 0.21.1 CVE-2021-3749● HIGH log4j 2.14.1 CVE-2021-44228● MEDIUM moment 2.29.1 prototype pollution● LOW ...3 more ✓ 4 critical findings · report generated
87%
Of audited codebases have a known open source vulnerabilitySource: Black Duck, Open Source Security and Risk Analysis (OSSRA) 2026
31%
Of breaches start by exploiting a vulnerabilitySource: Verizon, Data Breach Investigations Report 2026
SAST+DAST
Full coverage
5d
Average delivery
The risk

Every line of code
can be an open door

Your product may be ready for the market and, at the same time, open to attackers. Most critical vulnerabilities start in the code itself.

Code flaws
SQL injection, XSS, IDOR and broken business logic are introduced during development and rarely caught in functional testing.
Vulnerable dependencies
98% of the codebases analyzed use open source, and 87% contain at least one known vulnerability in those components. Your team probably doesn't track all of it.Source: Black Duck, Open Source Security and Risk Analysis (OSSRA) 2026
Secrets in code
API keys, credentials and hardcoded tokens are exposed in repositories every day. One careless commit is all it takes.
Before the scope

Depth set by why you need the review

A review before a launch, an answer to an enterprise customer and SOC 2 preparation call for different scopes and deliverables. We start by understanding which one you're facing.

Launch or new release
Focus on critical flows and on what changed since the last release. Findings arrive in risk order, with fix examples, so the team can resolve them before deploying.
Customer or investor requirement
The scope follows the security questionnaire or the due diligence. You get an executive report you can share and evidence of the fixes.
Security in development
For teams that want to stop fixing at the end: pipeline review, SAST rules tuned to your code and team training based on real findings.
Tools help, but people do the review

We use SAST, DAST and SCA tools from more than one vendor, including the ones your team already uses, with no commercial partnership with any of them. What sets the quality of the analysis is the manual review of business logic, which no tool does on its own.

Methodology

Layered review,
from tools to human eyes

SAST: static analysis
Automated source code review for insecure patterns.
Manual code review
Specialists review business logic and auth flows SAST misses.
DAST: dynamic analysis
Real attack simulation on the running application in staging.
SCA: dependencies
Maps all third-party libraries and flags known CVEs.
Deliverables

Everything the team needs to
fix with confidence

SAST/DAST Report
Every finding with exact code location, CVSS score and fix example.
Dependency Report
Full list of vulnerable libraries, affected versions and update recommendations.
Executive Report
Maturity level, critical findings and business impact in accessible language.
Dev Walkthrough
Live session with your dev team to walk through findings and guide fixes.

Your product deserves to go to
market securely

Tell us where the product stands and what prompted the review. The proposal comes back scoped to that goal.

✓ Proposal in 48h · No commitment · Full report included
Sources and references

Figures without a listed source, such as environments tested, certifications delivered, satisfaction and case results, come from IONICZ projects. Links checked in October 2026.